Initial situation

Since the full-scale invasion, civil society has carried much of Ukraine’s crisis response. Volunteering has become a mass civic act — 74 percent of Ukrainians say they have volunteered at least once since 2022. Behind that figure are first responders, evacuation teams, helping professionals, and volunteers working with war-affected children and adults alike.
Years after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, many of them are still active, as helping professionals, in NGOs or initiatives. They continue to help while living under the same conditions they respond to: air raids, losses, and uncertainty. That double exposure makes them vulnerable to stress and trauma. Latest research confirmed that humanitarian workers carry higher rates of depression, anxiety, and PTSD than the general population (Frontiers in Psychology, 2025).
Changing to a way of helping that keeps healthy boundaries and does not harm one’s own condition is difficult. There is always someone worse off, the logic goes, so who am I to stop, rest, or ask for anything? Rest starts to feel like a betrayal of the mission; naming one’s limits feels like failing it. The cost of helping stays quiet until it surfaces as exhaustion and burnout.
Exhaustion rarely stays contained. When demand keeps pressing on people already running low, the strain spreads through the organization — surfacing as overwork, tighter control, less transparency, and tense communication — and travels from one person to the next. And as more helpers deplete, so does the capacity of civil society to protect the people who depend on it.

